PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2478 vs Xeon W-2275 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2478 vs Xeon W-2275: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2478

2023

Why buy it

✅+24.7% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 19 MB).
✅Costs $544 less on MSRP ($568 MSRP vs $1,112 MSRP).
✅Delivers 94.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 48.9 vs 25.2 PassMark/$ ($568 MSRP vs $1,112 MSRP).
✅Draws 80W instead of 165W, a 85W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2275 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,776 vs 27,974).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-2275

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.2 vs 48.9 PassMark/$ ($1,112 MSRP vs $568 MSRP).
❌106.3% higher power demand at 165W vs 80W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2478 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2275 better than Xeon E-2478?

Yes. Xeon W-2275 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-2275 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2275 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2275 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E-2478 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon W-2275 comes in 95.8% more expensive on MSRP at $1,112 MSRP versus $568 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E-2478 is also 94.4% better value on MSRP (48.9 vs 25.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2478 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, and 24.7% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 19 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon E-2478 vs Xeon W-2275 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2478

The Xeon E-2478 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 27,776 points. Launch price was $568.

Xeon W-2275

The Xeon W-2275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,974 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2478 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2275 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon W-2275 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2478 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2275 — a 8% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2478 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Xeon E-2478 is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E-2478 scores 27,776 against the Xeon W-2275's 27,974 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W-2275. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2478 vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon W-2275.

Feature	Xeon E-2478	Xeon W-2275
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	14 / 28+75%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+8%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.3 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+25%	19.25 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	27,776	27,974
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	19,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,596
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2478 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-2275 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Xeon E-2478 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-2275 — the Xeon E-2478 supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2275 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Xeon E-2478) vs 4 (Xeon W-2275). PCIe lanes: 20 (Xeon E-2478) vs 48 (Xeon W-2275) — the Xeon W-2275 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Xeon E-2478	Xeon W-2275
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+64%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1024 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-2275 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E-2478) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2275). Primary use case: Xeon E-2478 targets Server, Xeon W-2275 targets Professional Content Creation / VFX. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2275 rivals Core i9-10940X.

Feature	Xeon E-2478	Xeon W-2275
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Server	Professional Content Creation / VFX

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E-2478 was priced at $568, while the Xeon W-2275 came in at $1112. On launch pricing ($568 vs $1112), Xeon E-2478 was $544 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E-2478 delivers 48.9 pts/$ vs 25.2 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2275 — making the Xeon E-2478 the 64.1% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E-2478	Xeon W-2275
MSRP	$568-49%	$1112
Performance per Dollar	48.9+94%	25.2
Release Date	2023	2019

Search Xeon E-2478 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-2275 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.