PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2478 vs Xeon W-2195 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2478 vs Xeon W-2195: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2478

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 140W, a 60W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2195 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,776 vs 27,977).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.9 vs 186.5 PassMark/$ ($568 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Xeon W-2195

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $418 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $568 MSRP).
✅Delivers 281.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 186.5 vs 48.9 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $568 MSRP).
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌75% higher power demand at 140W vs 80W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2478 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2195 better than Xeon E-2478?

Yes. Xeon W-2195 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-2195 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2195 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2195 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-2195 comes in $418 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $568 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 281.4% better value on MSRP (186.5 vs 48.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2478 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon E-2478 vs Xeon W-2195 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2478

The Xeon E-2478 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 27,776 points. Launch price was $568.

Xeon W-2195

The Xeon W-2195 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 27,977 points. Launch price was $2,553.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2478 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2195 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2195 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2478 versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2195 — a 18.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2478 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon E-2478 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-2195 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2478 scores 27,776 against the Xeon W-2195's 27,977 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W-2195. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2478 vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2195.

Feature	Xeon E-2478	Xeon W-2195
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+21%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+22%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	24.75 MB (total)+3%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	27,776	27,977
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	21,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	10,002

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2478 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-2195 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Xeon E-2478 versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-2195 — the Xeon E-2478 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2195 supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Xeon E-2478) vs 4 (Xeon W-2195). PCIe lanes: 20 (Xeon E-2478) vs 48 (Xeon W-2195) — the Xeon W-2195 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Xeon E-2478	Xeon W-2195
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+80%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	512 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-2195 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E-2478) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2195). Primary use case: Xeon E-2478 targets Server, Xeon W-2195 targets Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2195 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

Feature	Xeon E-2478	Xeon W-2195
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Server	Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E-2478 was priced at $568, while the Xeon W-2195 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($568 vs $150), Xeon W-2195 was $418 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E-2478 delivers 48.9 pts/$ vs 186.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2195 — making the Xeon W-2195 the 116.9% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E-2478	Xeon W-2195
MSRP	$568	$150-74%
Performance per Dollar	48.9	186.5+281%
Release Date	2023	2017

Search Xeon E-2478 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-2195 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.