
Xeon E3-1265L v3 vs Core i7-3770S

Xeon E3-1265L v3

Core i7-3770S
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1265L v3 is positioned at rank 610 and the Core i7-3770S is on rank 691, so the Xeon E3-1265L v3 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1265L v3
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3770S
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | Core i7-3770S |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($398) | ✅ More affordable ($250) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-WS (2013−2014) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | Core i7-3770S |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+59%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($398) | ✅ More affordable ($250) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Core i7-3770S

Xeon E3-1265L v3
The Xeon E3-1265L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,187 points. Launch price was $710.

Core i7-3770S
The Core i7-3770S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,173 points. Launch price was $330.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Core i7-3770S share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1265L v3 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-3770S — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-3770S (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon E3-1265L v3 uses the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-3770S uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1265L v3 scores 6,187 against the Core i7-3770S's 6,173 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E3-1265L v3. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 996 vs 694, a 35.7% lead for the Xeon E3-1265L v3 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,458 vs 2,303 (40.1% advantage for the Xeon E3-1265L v3). Both processors carry 8192 kB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | Core i7-3770S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total) | 8192 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell-WS (2013−2014) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 6,187 | 6,173 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 4,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 996+44% | 694 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,458+50% | 2,303 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1265L v3 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-3770S uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C220 Series,Intel 80 Series (Xeon E3-1265L v3) and Z77,H77,B75,Z68,P67,H67 (Core i7-3770S).
| Feature | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | Core i7-3770S |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: Yes (Xeon E3-1265L v3) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3770S). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics P4600 (Xeon E3-1265L v3) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3770S) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1265L v3 targets Server, Core i7-3770S targets Budget.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | Core i7-3770S |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics P4600 | HD Graphics 4000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Server | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E3-1265L v3 launched at $294 MSRP, while the Core i7-3770S debuted at $250. At current prices ($398 vs $250), the Core i7-3770S is $148 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1265L v3 delivers 15.5 pts/$ vs 24.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-3770S — making the Core i7-3770S the 45.5% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | Core i7-3770S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $294 | $250-15% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $398 | $250-37% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.5 | 24.7+59% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















