Xeon E3-1265L v3 vs Xeon E5-2658
Xeon E3-1265L v3
Xeon E5-2658
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1265L v3 is positioned at rank 610 and the Xeon E5-2658 is on rank 699, so the Xeon E3-1265L v3 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1265L v3
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2658
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | Xeon E5-2658 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($398) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($400) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-WS (2013−2014) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | Xeon E5-2658 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+0%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($398) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($400) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Xeon E5-2658
Xeon E3-1265L v3
The Xeon E3-1265L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,187 points. Launch price was $710.
Xeon E5-2658
The Xeon E5-2658 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,232 points. Launch price was $1,462.
Processing Power
The Xeon E3-1265L v3 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2658 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2658 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1265L v3 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2658 — a 42.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1265L v3 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E3-1265L v3 uses the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2658 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1265L v3 scores 6,187 against the Xeon E5-2658's 6,232 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2658. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1265L v3 vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2658.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | Xeon E5-2658 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+54% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+19% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total) | 20480 kB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell-WS (2013−2014) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 6,187 | 6,232 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 996 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,458 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1265L v3 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2658 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | Xeon E5-2658 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Xeon E3-1265L v3) / not specified (Xeon E5-2658). The Xeon E3-1265L v3 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics P4600), while the Xeon E5-2658 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1265L v3 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | Xeon E5-2658 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics P4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E3-1265L v3 launched at $294 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2658 debuted at $400. At current prices ($398 vs $400), the Xeon E3-1265L v3 is $2 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1265L v3 delivers 15.5 pts/$ vs 15.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2658 — making the Xeon E5-2658 the 0.2% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | Xeon E5-2658 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $294-27% | $400 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $398 | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.5 | 15.6 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Xeon E5-2658
