Xeon D-1622 vs Xeon E3-1265L v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-1622 vs Xeon E3-1265L v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-1622 vs Xeon E3-1265L v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-1622

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($195 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.8 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($195 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Draws 40W instead of 45W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1265L v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1265L v3 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Xeon E3-1265L v3

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics P4600, while Xeon D-1622 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,187 vs 6,205).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 31.8 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $195 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1622 better than Xeon E3-1265L v3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E3-1265L v3 is ahead with a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1622 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Xeon E3-1265L v3 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1622 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1622 is the better buy right now. Xeon D-1622 comes in $99 cheaper on MSRP at $195 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1265L v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 51.2% better value on MSRP (31.8 vs 21.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1622 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon D-1622 vs Xeon E3-1265L v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-1622

The Xeon D-1622 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,205 points. Launch price was $170.

Xeon E3-1265L v3

The Xeon E3-1265L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,187 points. Launch price was $710.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon D-1622 and Xeon E3-1265L v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-1622 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1265L v3 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1265L v3 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon D-1622 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon D-1622 scores 6,205 against the Xeon E3-1265L v3's 6,187 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon D-1622. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Xeon D-1622 vs 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1265L v3.

Feature	Xeon D-1622	Xeon E3-1265L v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.7 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+4%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB	8192 kB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark	6,205	6,187
Geekbench 6 Single	—	996
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	3,458

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1622 uses the FCBGA1667 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon D-1622	Xeon E3-1265L v3
Socket	FCBGA1667	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon D-1622) / Yes (Xeon E3-1265L v3). The Xeon E3-1265L v3 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics P4600), while the Xeon D-1622 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1265L v3 targets Server.

Feature	Xeon D-1622	Xeon E3-1265L v3
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics P4600
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	Yes
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon D-1622 was priced at $195, while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($195 vs $294), Xeon D-1622 was $99 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon D-1622 delivers 31.8 pts/$ vs 21.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1265L v3 — making the Xeon D-1622 the 40.8% better value option.

Feature	Xeon D-1622	Xeon E3-1265L v3
MSRP	$195-34%	$294
Performance per Dollar	31.8+51%	21.0
Release Date	2019	2013

Search Xeon D-1622 on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1265L v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.