Xeon E3-1265L v3 vs Ryzen 5 3600
Xeon E3-1265L v3
Ryzen 5 3600
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E3-1265L v3 is positioned at rank #610 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1265L v3
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 3600
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($398) | ✅ More affordable ($80) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-WS (2013−2014) / 22 nm) | ✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1322%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($398) | ✅ More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Ryzen 5 3600
Xeon E3-1265L v3
The Xeon E3-1265L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,187 points. Launch price was $710.
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Xeon E3-1265L v3 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1265L v3 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon E3-1265L v3 uses the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1265L v3 scores 6,187 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 96.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 996 vs 1,295, a 26.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,458 vs 1,898 (58.3% advantage for the Xeon E3-1265L v3). L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1265L v3 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.2 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+44% |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total) | 32 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Haswell-WS (2013−2014) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 6,187 | 17,685+186% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 996 | 1,295+30% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,458+82% | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1265L v3 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E3-1265L v3 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Xeon E3-1265L v3) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C220 Series,Intel 80 Series (Xeon E3-1265L v3) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR4-3200+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support Yes virtualization. The Xeon E3-1265L v3 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics P4600), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1265L v3 targets Server, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics P4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | Yes |
| Target Use | Server | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E3-1265L v3 launched at $294 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3600 debuted at $199. At current prices ($398 vs $80), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $318 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1265L v3 delivers 15.5 pts/$ vs 221.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 173.7% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1265L v3 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $294 | $199-32% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $398 | $80-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.5 | 221.1+1326% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E3-1265L v3 and Ryzen 5 3600
