Xeon E5-2609 v3
VS
Athlon 240GE

Xeon E5-2609 v3 vs Athlon 240GE

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v3

6 Cores6 Thrd85 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2014
VS
AMD

Athlon 240GE

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2609 v3 is positioned at rank #728 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2609 v3

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14244%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2689%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2389%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1846%
#423
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
MSRP: $6499|Avg: $3444
100%
#424
Xeon W-2155
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $150
99%
#425
Xeon 6740E
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $3949
99%
#425
Xeon Gold 6348
MSRP: $3583|Avg: $2097
99%
#427
EPYC 7702P
MSRP: $4425|Avg: N/A
99%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
98%
#429
EPYC 7552
MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650
98%
#431
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
MSRP: $5383|Avg: N/A
98%
#728
Xeon E5-2609 v3
MSRP: $306|Avg: $306
100%
#731
Xeon Bronze 3106
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
100%
#735
Xeon L5609
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
99%
#737
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 240GE

#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
108%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
108%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
108%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
108%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
107%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
107%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
107%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
106%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
106%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
105%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
104%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
104%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
104%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
103%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
100%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
100%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
94%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
94%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
93%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
90%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
88%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
86%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
83%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
83%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
80%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
79%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
78%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
73%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
69%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
68%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
67%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Athlon 240GE (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2609 v3Athlon 240GE
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($306)
More affordable ($110)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2609 v3 (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR4-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2609 v3Athlon 240GE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+184%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($306)
More affordable ($110)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2609 v3 and Athlon 240GE

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v3

The Xeon E5-2609 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,465 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

Athlon 240GE

The Athlon 240GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,561 points. Launch price was $75.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2609 v3 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Athlon 240GE offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2609 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2609 v3 versus 3.5 GHz on the Athlon 240GE — a 59.3% clock advantage for the Athlon 240GE (base: 1.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon E5-2609 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Athlon 240GE uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2609 v3 scores 4,465 against the Athlon 240GE's 4,561 — a 2.1% lead for the Athlon 240GE. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2609 v3 vs 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 240GE.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v3Athlon 240GE
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+200%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz
3.5 GHz+84%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
3.5 GHz+84%
L3 Cache
15 MB (total)+275%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
4,465
4,561+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
930
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,200
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2609 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 240GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v3Athlon 240GE
Socket
LGA2011
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2609 v3) / AMD-V (Athlon 240GE). The Athlon 240GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the Xeon E5-2609 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 240GE targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon 240GE rivals Pentium Gold G5400.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v3Athlon 240GE
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Vega 3
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-2609 v3 launched at $306 MSRP, while the Athlon 240GE debuted at $75. At current prices ($306 vs $110), the Athlon 240GE is $196 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2609 v3 delivers 14.6 pts/$ vs 41.5 pts/$ for the Athlon 240GE — making the Athlon 240GE the 95.9% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v3Athlon 240GE
MSRP
$306
$75-75%
Avg Price (30d)
$306
$110-64%
Performance per Dollar
14.6
41.5+184%
Release Date
2014
2018