Xeon E5-2609 v3
VS
Core i5-4670T

Xeon E5-2609 v3 vs Core i5-4670T

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v3

6 Cores6 Thrd85 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i5-4670T

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2609 v3 is positioned at rank 728 and the Core i5-4670T is on rank 712, so the Core i5-4670T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2609 v3

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14244%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2689%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2389%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1846%
#423
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
MSRP: $6499|Avg: $3444
100%
#424
Xeon W-2155
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $150
99%
#425
Xeon 6740E
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $3949
99%
#425
Xeon Gold 6348
MSRP: $3583|Avg: $2097
99%
#427
EPYC 7702P
MSRP: $4425|Avg: N/A
99%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
98%
#429
EPYC 7552
MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650
98%
#431
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
MSRP: $5383|Avg: N/A
98%
#728
Xeon E5-2609 v3
MSRP: $306|Avg: $306
100%
#731
Xeon Bronze 3106
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
100%
#735
Xeon L5609
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
99%
#737
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4670T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13125%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12402%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9005%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2713%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2149%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1880%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1077%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1063%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
967%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
967%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
957%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
931%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
918%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
914%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
906%
#712
Core i5-4670T
MSRP: $189|Avg: $35
100%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
99%
#714
Pentium G3420
MSRP: $86|Avg: $40
99%
#715
Core i5-6500
MSRP: $239|Avg: $123
99%
#716
Core i7-4770T
MSRP: $250|Avg: $39
99%
#717
Core i3-4340
MSRP: $149|Avg: $50
99%
#718
Core i5-4690K
MSRP: $243|Avg: $101
99%
#719
Core i5-4670R
MSRP: $224|Avg: $29
98%
#720
Core i5-3340
MSRP: $182|Avg: $15
98%
#721
Core i7-4770
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
98%
#722
Athlon II X3 440
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
98%
#723
Core i3-4130T
MSRP: $124|Avg: $10
98%
#724
Celeron E3300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#725
Core i7-6700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $60
97%
#726
Core i7-4790K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $93
97%
#727
Celeron E3400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($306) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2609 v3 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2609 v3Core i5-4670T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($306)
More affordable ($35)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-4670T ($35), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($271 less, 89% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2609 v3Core i5-4670T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+779%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($306)
More affordable ($35)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2609 v3 and Core i5-4670T

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v3

The Xeon E5-2609 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,465 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i5-4670T

The Core i5-4670T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,488 points. Launch price was $220.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2609 v3 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i5-4670T offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2609 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2609 v3 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4670T — a 53.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670T (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon E5-2609 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-4670T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2609 v3 scores 4,465 against the Core i5-4670T's 4,488 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-4670T. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2609 v3 vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670T.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v3Core i5-4670T
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+50%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz
3.3 GHz+74%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2.3 GHz+21%
L3 Cache
15 MB (total)+150%
6144 kB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
4,465
4,488
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2609 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4670T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v3Core i5-4670T
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-2609 v3 launched at $306 MSRP, while the Core i5-4670T debuted at $189. At current prices ($306 vs $35), the Core i5-4670T is $271 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2609 v3 delivers 14.6 pts/$ vs 128.2 pts/$ for the Core i5-4670T — making the Core i5-4670T the 159.1% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v3Core i5-4670T
MSRP
$306
$189-38%
Avg Price (30d)
$306
$35-89%
Performance per Dollar
14.6
128.2+778%
Release Date
2014
2013