Xeon E5-2609 v3 vs Athlon 3000G
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Athlon 3000G
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2609 v3 is positioned at rank #728 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2609 v3
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 3000G
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2609 v3 | Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($306) | ✅ More affordable ($60) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen+ (2018−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2609 v3 | Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+408%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($306) | ✅ More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2609 v3 and Athlon 3000G
Xeon E5-2609 v3
The Xeon E5-2609 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,465 points. Launch price was $800.
Athlon 3000G
The Athlon 3000G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,446 points. Launch price was $49.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2609 v3 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Athlon 3000G offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2609 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2609 v3 versus 3.5 GHz on the Athlon 3000G — a 59.3% clock advantage for the Athlon 3000G (base: 1.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon E5-2609 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Athlon 3000G uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2609 v3 scores 4,465 against the Athlon 3000G's 4,446 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2609 v3. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2609 v3 vs 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 3000G.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2609 v3 | Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+200% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz+84% |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz+84% |
| L3 Cache | 15 MB (total)+275% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 4,465 | 4,446 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 1,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 956 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,970 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2609 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 3000G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2609 v3 | Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2609 v3) / true (Athlon 3000G). The Athlon 3000G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3 Graphics), while the Xeon E5-2609 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Athlon 3000G rivals Pentium Gold G6400.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2609 v3 | Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 3 Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-2609 v3 launched at $306 MSRP, while the Athlon 3000G debuted at $49. At current prices ($306 vs $60), the Athlon 3000G is $246 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2609 v3 delivers 14.6 pts/$ vs 74.1 pts/$ for the Athlon 3000G — making the Athlon 3000G the 134.2% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2609 v3 | Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $306 | $49-84% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $306 | $60-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.6 | 74.1+408% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2609 v3 and Athlon 3000G
