Xeon E5-2609 v3
VS
Core i5-3450

Xeon E5-2609 v3 vs Core i5-3450

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v3

6 Cores6 Thrd85 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i5-3450

4 Cores4 Thrd77 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2609 v3 is positioned at rank 728 and the Core i5-3450 is on rank 696, so the Core i5-3450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2609 v3

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14244%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2689%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2389%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1846%
#423
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
MSRP: $6499|Avg: $3444
100%
#424
Xeon W-2155
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $150
99%
#425
Xeon 6740E
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $3949
99%
#425
Xeon Gold 6348
MSRP: $3583|Avg: $2097
99%
#427
EPYC 7702P
MSRP: $4425|Avg: N/A
99%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
98%
#429
EPYC 7552
MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650
98%
#431
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
MSRP: $5383|Avg: N/A
98%
#728
Xeon E5-2609 v3
MSRP: $306|Avg: $306
100%
#731
Xeon Bronze 3106
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
100%
#735
Xeon L5609
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
99%
#737
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3450

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12697%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11998%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8711%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2624%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2079%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1818%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1042%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1028%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
936%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
936%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
925%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
900%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
888%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
884%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
876%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
97%
#695
FX-4300
MSRP: $122|Avg: $25
100%
#696
Core i5-3450
MSRP: $184|Avg: $95
100%
#697
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
100%
#699
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
99%
#700
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
99%
#701
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
99%
#702
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
98%
#703
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
98%
#704
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
98%
#705
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
98%
#708
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
97%
#710
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($306) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2609 v3 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2609 v3Core i5-3450
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($306)
More affordable ($95)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-3450 ($95), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($211 less, 69% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2609 v3Core i5-3450
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+226%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($306)
More affordable ($95)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2609 v3 and Core i5-3450

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v3

The Xeon E5-2609 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,465 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i5-3450

The Core i5-3450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,517 points. Launch price was $186.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2609 v3 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i5-3450 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2609 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2609 v3 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-3450 — a 59.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-3450 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2609 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-3450 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2609 v3 scores 4,465 against the Core i5-3450's 4,517 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-3450. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2609 v3 vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-3450.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v3Core i5-3450
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+50%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz
3.5 GHz+84%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
3.1 GHz+63%
L3 Cache
15 MB (total)+150%
6144 kB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
4,465
4,517+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2609 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3450 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v3Core i5-3450
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
32
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2609 v3) / true (Core i5-3450). The Core i5-3450 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 2500), while the Xeon E5-2609 v3 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v3Core i5-3450
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 2500
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-2609 v3 launched at $306 MSRP, while the Core i5-3450 debuted at $184. At current prices ($306 vs $95), the Core i5-3450 is $211 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2609 v3 delivers 14.6 pts/$ vs 47.5 pts/$ for the Core i5-3450 — making the Core i5-3450 the 106.1% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-2609 v3Core i5-3450
MSRP
$306
$184-40%
Avg Price (30d)
$306
$95-69%
Performance per Dollar
14.6
47.5+225%
Release Date
2014
2012