Xeon E5-2620 v4
VS
Core i3-10305

Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Core i3-10305

Intel

Xeon E5-2620 v4

8 Cores16 Thrd85 WWMax: 3 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core i3-10305

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2620 v4 is positioned at rank #304 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2620 v4

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
4491%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
848%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
753%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
582%
#233
Xeon w5-2545
MSRP: $889|Avg: $1100
99%
#234
Xeon W-1250P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
99%
#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
98%
#304
Xeon E5-2620 v4
MSRP: $417|Avg: $410
100%
#306
Xeon Silver 4108
MSRP: $417|Avg: $46
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-10305

#188
Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G
MSRP: $165|Avg: $165
107%
#189
Ryzen 7 4700GE
MSRP: $299|Avg: $200
107%
#190
Core i5-10400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $100
106%
#191
Core i5-10600KF
MSRP: $250|Avg: $145
106%
#192
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
MSRP: $99|Avg: $70
106%
#193
Core i9-12900F
MSRP: $494|Avg: $370
105%
#194
Core i5-12400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $195
105%
#195
Ryzen 5 7400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
104%
#196
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $589
104%
#197
Ryzen 5 5600X3D
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
104%
#198
Core i3-9350KF
MSRP: $173|Avg: $80
103%
#199
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
MSRP: $220|Avg: $220
103%
#200
Core i3-9300
MSRP: $143|Avg: $75
103%
#201
Ryzen 7 3800XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $249
102%
#202
Core i5-11400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $140
101%
#203
Core i3-10305
MSRP: $149|Avg: $100
100%
#204
Core i3-9320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $80
100%
#205
Core i3-10105
MSRP: $122|Avg: $90
99%
#206
Core i3-13100E
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#207
Core i9-13900F
MSRP: $524|Avg: $536
99%
#208
Processor 300
MSRP: $82|Avg: $80
99%
#209
Ryzen 5 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $145
98%
#210
Ryzen 5 2400GE
MSRP: $169|Avg: $80
98%
#211
Core i9-14900KS
MSRP: $749|Avg: $670
98%
#212
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $384
97%
#213
Core i3-8100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $59
97%
#214
Core i7-13700E
MSRP: $390|Avg: $380
97%
#215
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
MSRP: $430|Avg: $270
96%
#216
Core i7-9700
MSRP: $333|Avg: $150
96%
#217
Core i5-13500TE
MSRP: $235|Avg: $250
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-10305 (2021) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2620 v4Core i3-10305
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($410)
More affordable ($100)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake-R (2021) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2620 v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2620 v4Core i3-10305
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+308%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($410)
More affordable ($100)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Core i3-10305

Intel

Xeon E5-2620 v4

The Xeon E5-2620 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 9,255 points. Launch price was $417.

Intel

Core i3-10305

The Core i3-10305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,210 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2620 v4 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i3-10305 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2620 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v4 versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-10305 — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i3-10305 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2620 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-10305 uses Comet Lake-R (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2620 v4 scores 9,255 against the Core i3-10305's 9,210 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2620 v4. L3 cache: 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-10305.

FeatureXeon E5-2620 v4Core i3-10305
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+100%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3 GHz
4.5 GHz+50%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3.8 GHz+81%
L3 Cache
20 MB+150%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Comet Lake-R (2021)
PassMark
9,255
9,210
Geekbench 6 Single
1,536
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2620 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-10305 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2133 memory speed. The Xeon E5-2620 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2620 v4) vs 2 (Core i3-10305). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2620 v4) vs 16 (Core i3-10305) — the Xeon E5-2620 v4 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2620 v4) and Z490,B460 (Core i3-10305).

FeatureXeon E5-2620 v4Core i3-10305
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
1536 GB+1100%
128 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40+150%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2620 v4) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10305). The Core i3-10305 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureXeon E5-2620 v4Core i3-10305
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-2620 v4 launched at $417 MSRP, while the Core i3-10305 debuted at $149. At current prices ($410 vs $100), the Core i3-10305 is $310 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2620 v4 delivers 22.6 pts/$ vs 92.1 pts/$ for the Core i3-10305 — making the Core i3-10305 the 121.3% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-2620 v4Core i3-10305
MSRP
$417
$149-64%
Avg Price (30d)
$410
$100-76%
Performance per Dollar
22.6
92.1+308%
Release Date
2016
2021