Xeon E5-2640 v4 vs Xeon W-2133

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 vs Xeon W-2133 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 vs Xeon W-2133: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2640 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+203% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8.3 MB).
✅Draws 90W instead of 140W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,470 vs 12,615).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-2133

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2640 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $617 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2640 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌55.6% higher power demand at 140W vs 90W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2133 better than Xeon E5-2640 v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2640 v4 is ahead with a 10.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2133 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2640 v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 203% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8.3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2133 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2133 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-2133 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $617 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2640 v4 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 10.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-2133 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016), more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 10/20, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 vs Xeon W-2133 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2640 v4

The Xeon E5-2640 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 12,470 points. Launch price was $939.

Xeon W-2133

The Xeon W-2133 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $617.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2640 v4 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-2133 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2640 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2640 v4 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-2133 — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2133 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon E5-2640 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-2133 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2640 v4 scores 12,470 against the Xeon W-2133's 12,615 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon W-2133. L3 cache: 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2640 v4 vs 8.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2133.

Feature	Xeon E5-2640 v4	Xeon W-2133
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.9 GHz+15%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.6 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	25 MB+203%	8.25 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2.5 MB+150%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	12,470	12,615+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	6,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,292
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	6,647

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2640 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-2133 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-2640 v4	Xeon W-2133
Socket	LGA2011	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	—	512 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2640 v4) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-2133). Primary use case: Xeon W-2133 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2133 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.