Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs Ryzen 3 210
Xeon E5-2650 v4
Ryzen 3 210
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2650 v4
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 210
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2650 v4 | Ryzen 3 210 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($45) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($99) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-EP (2016) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2650 v4 | Ryzen 3 210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+121%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($45) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($99) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Ryzen 3 210
Xeon E5-2650 v4
The Xeon E5-2650 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,290 points. Launch price was $1,166.
Ryzen 3 210
The Ryzen 3 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,209 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2650 v4 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 3 210 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v4 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 210 — a 47.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 210 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 210 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2650 v4 scores 13,290 against the Ryzen 3 210's 13,209 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2650 v4. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 210.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650 v4 | Ryzen 3 210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+200% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz+62% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz+36% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+275% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Broadwell-EP (2016) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 13,290 | 13,209 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 515 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 6,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 210 uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Xeon E5-2650 v4 versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 3 210 — the Ryzen 3 210 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2650 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2650 v4) vs 2 (Ryzen 3 210). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2650 v4) vs 14 (Ryzen 3 210) — the Xeon E5-2650 v4 offers 26 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2650 v4) and SoC (Ryzen 3 210).
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650 v4 | Ryzen 3 210 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1536 GB+500% | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 40+186% | 14 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2650 v4) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 3 210). The Ryzen 3 210 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2650 v4 targets Server, Ryzen 3 210 targets Laptop.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650 v4 | Ryzen 3 210 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 740M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Server | Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-2650 v4 launched at $1166 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 210 debuted at $99. At current prices ($45 vs $99), the Xeon E5-2650 v4 is $54 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2650 v4 delivers 295.3 pts/$ vs 133.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 210 — making the Xeon E5-2650 v4 the 75.5% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650 v4 | Ryzen 3 210 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1166 | $99-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-55% | $99 |
| Performance per Dollar | 295.3+121% | 133.4 |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Ryzen 3 210
