Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs Ryzen Embedded V2516
Xeon E5-2650 v4
Ryzen Embedded V2516
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2650 v4
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded V2516
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2650 v4 | Ryzen Embedded V2516 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($45) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($300) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-EP (2016) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Renoir (2020−2023) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2650 v4 | Ryzen Embedded V2516 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+565%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($45) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($300) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Ryzen Embedded V2516
Xeon E5-2650 v4
The Xeon E5-2650 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,290 points. Launch price was $1,166.
Ryzen Embedded V2516
The Ryzen Embedded V2516 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.95 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 13,329 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2650 v4 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V2516 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v4 versus 3.95 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2516 — a 30.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V2516 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2516 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2650 v4 scores 13,290 against the Ryzen Embedded V2516's 13,329 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V2516. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2516.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650 v4 | Ryzen Embedded V2516 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.95 GHz+36% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+5% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+275% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Broadwell-EP (2016) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 13,290 | 13,329 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2516 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650 v4 | Ryzen Embedded V2516 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1536 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2650 v4) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V2516). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2650 v4 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650 v4 | Ryzen Embedded V2516 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-2650 v4 launched at $1166 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V2516 debuted at $300. At current prices ($45 vs $300), the Xeon E5-2650 v4 is $255 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2650 v4 delivers 295.3 pts/$ vs 44.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V2516 — making the Xeon E5-2650 v4 the 147.7% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650 v4 | Ryzen Embedded V2516 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1166 | $300-74% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-85% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 295.3+565% | 44.4 |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Ryzen Embedded V2516
