Xeon E5-2673 v2 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2673 v2 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2673 v2 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2673 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 110W instead of 150W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2687W v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon E5-2687W v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,301 vs 12,331).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,112 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2673 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌36.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 110W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2673 v2 better than Xeon E5-2687W v2?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2687W v2 is ahead with a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2673 v2 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2673 v2 also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2673 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2673 v2 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2687W v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2673 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,112 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2687W v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2687W v2 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2673 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2673 v2 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2673 v2

The Xeon E5-2673 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 12,331 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2687W v2

The Xeon E5-2687W v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,301 points. Launch price was $1,605.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2673 v2 and Xeon E5-2687W v2 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2673 v2 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W v2 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Xeon E5-2687W v2 is built on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2673 v2 scores 12,331 against the Xeon E5-2687W v2's 12,301 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2673 v2. L3 cache: 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2673 v2 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2687W v2.

Feature	Xeon E5-2673 v2	Xeon E5-2687W v2
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.4 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	25 MB+25%	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	—	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	12,331	12,301