Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs Xeon E5-2673 v2
Xeon E5-2618L v4
Xeon E5-2673 v2
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is positioned at rank 429 and the Xeon E5-2673 v2 is on rank 270, so the Xeon E5-2673 v2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2618L v4
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2673 v2
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2618L v4 | Xeon E5-2673 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($33) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2618L v4 | Xeon E5-2673 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($33) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon E5-2673 v2
Xeon E5-2618L v4
The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 12,429 points. Launch price was $779.
Xeon E5-2673 v2
The Xeon E5-2673 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 12,331 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2618L v4 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E5-2673 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2618L v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2618L v4 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2673 v2 — a 58.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2673 v2. The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is built on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2618L v4 scores 12,429 against the Xeon E5-2673 v2's 12,331 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5-2618L v4. Both processors carry 25 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2618L v4 | Xeon E5-2673 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4 GHz+82% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB | 25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB | — |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 12,429 | 12,331 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon E5-2673 v2
