Xeon E5-2673 v2 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2673 v2 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2673 v2 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2673 v2

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 30 MB).

Xeon E5-2692 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+20% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 110W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,119 vs 12,331).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2673 v2 better than Xeon E5-2692 v2?

Yes. Xeon E5-2673 v2 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2673 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2673 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2673 v2 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2673 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2692 v2 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Xeon E5-2673 v2 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2673 v2

The Xeon E5-2673 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 12,331 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2692 v2

The Xeon E5-2692 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,119 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2673 v2 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2692 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2673 v2 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2692 v2 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2673 v2 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2692 v2 is built on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2673 v2 scores 12,331 against the Xeon E5-2692 v2's 12,119 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2673 v2. L3 cache: 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2673 v2 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2692 v2.

Feature	Xeon E5-2673 v2	Xeon E5-2692 v2
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+33%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+50%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	25 MB	30 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	—	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	12,331+2%	12,119