Xeon E5-2673 v4 vs Xeon Gold 5218T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2673 v4 vs Xeon Gold 5218T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2673 v4 vs Xeon Gold 5218T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2673 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+127.3% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 22 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (21,277 vs 21,433).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 135W vs 105W.

Xeon Gold 5218T

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 105W instead of 135W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2673 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 50 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,572 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2673 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5218T better than Xeon E5-2673 v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2673 v4 is ahead with a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5218T pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2673 v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 127.3% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5218T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5218T is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 5218T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,572 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2673 v4 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 5218T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 20/40. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2673 v4 vs Xeon Gold 5218T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2673 v4

The Xeon E5-2673 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,277 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 5218T

The Xeon Gold 5218T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,433 points. Launch price was $1,561.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2673 v4 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5218T offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2673 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2673 v4 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218T — a 49.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5218T (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2673 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5218T uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2673 v4 scores 21,277 against the Xeon Gold 5218T's 21,433 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 5218T. L3 cache: 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2673 v4 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 5218T.

Feature	Xeon E5-2673 v4	Xeon Gold 5218T
Cores / Threads	20 / 40+25%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	3.8 GHz+65%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+10%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	50 MB+127%	22 MB
L2 Cache	5 MB	16 MB+220%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	21,277	21,433

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2673 v4 uses the FCLGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 5218T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.