Xeon E5-2673 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4216

Intel

Xeon E5-2673 v4

20 Cores40 Thrd135 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2016

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4216

16 Cores32 Thrd100 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon E5-2673 v4

2016

Why buy it

  • +1.2% higher PassMark.
  • +127.3% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 22 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 35% higher power demand at 135W vs 100W.
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Silver 4216

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 100W instead of 135W, a 35W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (21,022 vs 21,277).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 50 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $1,011 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2673 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4216 better than Xeon E5-2673 v4?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Xeon Silver 4216 is ahead with a 2.5% average FPS lead across 26 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2673 v4 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2673 v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 127.3% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 22 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2673 v4 is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 127.3% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 22 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Silver 4216 is the smarter buy today. Xeon Silver 4216 is at an unclear MSRP at $1,011 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 26 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon E5-2673 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Silver 4216 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetXeon E5-2673 v4Xeon Silver 4216
1080p
low180 FPS174 FPS
medium157 FPS139 FPS
high124 FPS111 FPS
ultra99 FPS87 FPS
1440p
low149 FPS139 FPS
medium125 FPS109 FPS
high95 FPS86 FPS
ultra77 FPS68 FPS
4K
low69 FPS66 FPS
medium61 FPS55 FPS
high47 FPS43 FPS
ultra38 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetXeon E5-2673 v4Xeon Silver 4216
1080p
low365 FPS188 FPS
medium332 FPS167 FPS
high280 FPS145 FPS
ultra225 FPS118 FPS
1440p
low314 FPS162 FPS
medium285 FPS148 FPS
high243 FPS128 FPS
ultra189 FPS104 FPS
4K
low196 FPS105 FPS
medium179 FPS97 FPS
high153 FPS85 FPS
ultra121 FPS68 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetXeon E5-2673 v4Xeon Silver 4216
1080p
low532 FPS526 FPS
medium505 FPS526 FPS
high458 FPS526 FPS
ultra410 FPS526 FPS
1440p
low522 FPS526 FPS
medium436 FPS526 FPS
high389 FPS526 FPS
ultra349 FPS526 FPS
4K
low400 FPS473 FPS
medium322 FPS372 FPS
high287 FPS331 FPS
ultra239 FPS269 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetXeon E5-2673 v4Xeon Silver 4216
1080p
low532 FPS526 FPS
medium532 FPS526 FPS
high532 FPS526 FPS
ultra532 FPS526 FPS
1440p
low532 FPS526 FPS
medium532 FPS526 FPS
high532 FPS508 FPS
ultra456 FPS430 FPS
4K
low518 FPS466 FPS
medium465 FPS417 FPS
high411 FPS372 FPS
ultra352 FPS321 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2673 v4 and Xeon Silver 4216

Intel

Xeon E5-2673 v4

The Xeon E5-2673 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,277 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4216

The Xeon Silver 4216 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,022 points. Launch price was $1,002.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2673 v4 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4216 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2673 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2673 v4 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4216 — a 32.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4216 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2673 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4216 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2673 v4 scores 21,277 against the Xeon Silver 4216's 21,022 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2673 v4. L3 cache: 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2673 v4 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Silver 4216.

FeatureXeon E5-2673 v4Xeon Silver 4216
Cores / Threads
20 / 40+25%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz+39%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz+10%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
50 MB+127%
22 MB
L2 Cache
5 MB
16 MB+220%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
21,277+1%
21,022
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,013
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,286
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2673 v4 uses the FCLGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4216 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2673 v4Xeon Silver 4216
Socket
FCLGA2011-3
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
1024 GB
RAM Channels
6
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2673 v4) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Silver 4216). Primary use case: Xeon Silver 4216 targets Server / Edge computing. Direct competitor: Xeon Silver 4216 rivals EPYC 7262.

FeatureXeon E5-2673 v4Xeon Silver 4216
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Server / Edge computing