Xeon E5-2673 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4216

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2673 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4216 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2673 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4216: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2673 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅+127.3% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 22 MB).

Trade-offs

❌35% higher power demand at 135W vs 100W.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Silver 4216

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 135W, a 35W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (21,022 vs 21,277).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 50 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,011 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2673 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4216 better than Xeon E5-2673 v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Silver 4216 is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2673 v4 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2673 v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 127.3% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2673 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 127.3% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4216 is the better buy right now. Xeon Silver 4216 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,011 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2673 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4216 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2673 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4216 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2673 v4

The Xeon E5-2673 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,277 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Silver 4216

The Xeon Silver 4216 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,022 points. Launch price was $1,002.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2673 v4 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4216 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2673 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2673 v4 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4216 — a 32.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4216 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2673 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4216 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2673 v4 scores 21,277 against the Xeon Silver 4216's 21,022 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2673 v4. L3 cache: 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2673 v4 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Silver 4216.

Feature	Xeon E5-2673 v4	Xeon Silver 4216
Cores / Threads	20 / 40+25%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	3.2 GHz+39%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+10%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	50 MB+127%	22 MB
L2 Cache	5 MB	16 MB+220%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	21,277+1%	21,022
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,013
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	12,286

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2673 v4 uses the FCLGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4216 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-2673 v4	Xeon Silver 4216
Socket	FCLGA2011-3	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	1024 GB
RAM Channels	—	6
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2673 v4) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Silver 4216). Primary use case: Xeon Silver 4216 targets Server / Edge computing. Direct competitor: Xeon Silver 4216 rivals EPYC 7262.