Xeon E5-2675 V3 vs Xeon E5-2676 V3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2675 V3 vs Xeon E5-2676 V3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2675 V3 vs Xeon E5-2676 V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2675 V3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Draws 110W instead of 120W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E5-2676 V3

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2675 V3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,178 vs 13,180).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 40 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2675 V3 better than Xeon E5-2676 V3?

Yes. Xeon E5-2675 V3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2675 V3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2675 V3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2675 V3 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2675 V3 comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $1,800 MSRP versus $1,800 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 0.0% better value on MSRP (7.3 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2676 V3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2675 V3 vs Xeon E5-2676 V3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2675 V3

The Xeon E5-2675 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 13,180 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2676 V3

The Xeon E5-2676 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,178 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2675 V3 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon E5-2676 V3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2675 V3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2675 V3 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2676 V3 — a 26.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2676 V3 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). Both are built on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2675 V3 scores 13,180 against the Xeon E5-2676 V3's 13,178 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E5-2675 V3. L3 cache: 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2675 V3 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2676 V3.

Feature	Xeon E5-2675 V3	Xeon E5-2676 V3
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+33%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	3 GHz+30%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.4 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	40 MB (total)+33%	30 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	13,180	13,178

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011-3 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Xeon E5-2675 V3	Xeon E5-2676 V3
Socket	LGA2011-3	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-2675 V3 was priced at $1800, while the Xeon E5-2676 V3 came in at $1800. On launch pricing ($1800 vs $1800), Xeon E5-2676 V3 was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2675 V3 delivers 7.3 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2676 V3 — making the Xeon E5-2675 V3 the 0% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-2675 V3	Xeon E5-2676 V3
MSRP	$1800	$1800
Performance per Dollar	7.3	7.3
Release Date	2014	2015

Search Xeon E5-2675 V3 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2676 V3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.