Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs Xeon E5-2675 V3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs Xeon E5-2675 V3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs Xeon E5-2675 V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2650 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $634 less on MSRP ($1,166 MSRP vs $1,800 MSRP).
✅Delivers 55.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($1,166 MSRP vs $1,800 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 110W, a 5W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2675 V3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 40 MB).

Xeon E5-2675 V3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 30 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (13,180 vs 13,290).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 11.4 PassMark/$ ($1,800 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2650 v4 better than Xeon E5-2675 V3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2675 V3 is ahead with a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2650 v4 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2675 V3 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2650 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2650 v4 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2650 v4 comes in $634 cheaper on MSRP at $1,166 MSRP versus $1,800 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2675 V3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 55.7% better value on MSRP (11.4 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2650 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2014), more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 16/32, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs Xeon E5-2675 V3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2650 v4

The Xeon E5-2650 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,290 points. Launch price was $1,166.

Xeon E5-2675 V3

The Xeon E5-2675 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 13,180 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2650 v4 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E5-2675 V3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2675 V3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v4 versus 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2675 V3 — a 23.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2650 v4 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2675 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2650 v4 scores 13,290 against the Xeon E5-2675 V3's 13,180 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5-2650 v4. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2675 V3.

Feature	Xeon E5-2650 v4	Xeon E5-2675 V3
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	16 / 32+33%
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+26%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+22%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	40 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-EP (2016)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	13,290	13,180

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2675 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-2650 v4	Xeon E5-2675 V3
Socket	LGA2011	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	1536 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	40	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2650 v4) / not specified (Xeon E5-2675 V3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2650 v4 targets Server.

Feature	Xeon E5-2650 v4	Xeon E5-2675 V3
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-2650 v4 was priced at $1166, while the Xeon E5-2675 V3 came in at $1800. On launch pricing ($1166 vs $1800), Xeon E5-2650 v4 was $634 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2650 v4 delivers 11.4 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2675 V3 — making the Xeon E5-2650 v4 the 43.5% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-2650 v4	Xeon E5-2675 V3
MSRP	$1166-35%	$1800
Performance per Dollar	11.4+56%	7.3
Release Date	2016	2014

Search Xeon E5-2650 v4 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2675 V3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.