Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Xeon E5-4610 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Xeon E5-4610 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Xeon E5-4610 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2680 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 25 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,864 vs 15,084).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,745 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4610 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-4610 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 105W instead of 120W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2680 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 30 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4610 v4 better than Xeon E5-2680 v3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2680 v3 is ahead with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4610 v4 pulls ahead with 1.5% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2680 v3 also has the bigger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 25 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4610 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4610 v4 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2680 v3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-4610 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,745 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2680 v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2680 v3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-4610 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Xeon E5-4610 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2680 v3

The Xeon E5-2680 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,864 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-4610 v4

The Xeon E5-4610 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,084 points. Launch price was $1,219.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2680 v3 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2680 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2680 v3 versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4610 v4 — a 58.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2680 v3 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2680 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2680 v3 scores 14,864 against the Xeon E5-4610 v4's 15,084 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon E5-4610 v4. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-4610 v4.

Feature	Xeon E5-2680 v3	Xeon E5-4610 v4
Cores / Threads	12 / 24+20%	10 / 20
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+83%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+39%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+20%	25 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+10140%	2.5 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	14,864	15,084+1%