Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Xeon Gold 5115

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Xeon Gold 5115 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Xeon Gold 5115: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2680 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+118.2% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 14 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,864 vs 15,017).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,745 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5115 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌41.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 85W.

Xeon Gold 5115

2017

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 85W instead of 120W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (14 MB vs 30 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5115 better than Xeon E5-2680 v3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2680 v3 is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5115 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2680 v3 also has the bigger cache pool with 118.2% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 14 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5115 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5115 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2680 v3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 5115 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,745 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2680 v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2680 v3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 5115 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Xeon Gold 5115 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2680 v3

The Xeon E5-2680 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,864 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 5115

The Xeon Gold 5115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB. L2 cache: 10 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 15,017 points. Launch price was $1,221.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2680 v3 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5115 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2680 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2680 v3 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5115 — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2680 v3 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon E5-2680 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5115 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2680 v3 scores 14,864 against the Xeon Gold 5115's 15,017 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Gold 5115. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs 13.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 5115.

Feature	Xeon E5-2680 v3	Xeon Gold 5115
Cores / Threads	12 / 24+20%	10 / 20
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+3%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+118%	13.75 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+2460%	10 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	14,864	15,017+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2680 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 5115 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.