Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4215R

Intel

Xeon E5-2680 v3

12 Cores24 Thrd120 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4215R

8 Cores16 Thrd130 WWMax: 4 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4215R Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4215R FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4215R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2680 v3

2014

Why buy it

  • +1.2% higher PassMark.
  • +172.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 11 MB).
  • Draws 120W instead of 130W, a 10W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $1,745 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4215R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Silver 4215R

2020

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (14,683 vs 14,864).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 30 MB).
    • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Xeon E5-2680 v3 better than Xeon Silver 4215R?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Silver 4215R is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2680 v3 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2680 v3 also has the bigger cache pool with 172.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 11 MB).
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2680 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 172.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 11 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Xeon E5-2680 v3 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2680 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,745 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Silver 4215R is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Xeon Silver 4215R makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4215R Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Xeon E5-2680 v3

    The Xeon E5-2680 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,864 points. Launch price was $800.

    Intel

    Xeon Silver 4215R

    The Xeon Silver 4215R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,683 points. Launch price was $794.

    Processing Power

    The Xeon E5-2680 v3 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4215R offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2680 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2680 v3 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4215R — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4215R (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2680 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4215R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2680 v3 scores 14,864 against the Xeon Silver 4215R's 14,683 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2680 v3. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4215R.

    FeatureXeon E5-2680 v3Xeon Silver 4215R
    Cores / Threads
    12 / 24+50%
    8 / 16
    Boost Clock
    3.3 GHz
    4 GHz+21%
    Base Clock
    2.5 GHz
    3.2 GHz+28%
    L3 Cache
    30 MB (total)+173%
    11 MB
    L2 Cache
    256K (per core)+3100%
    8 MB
    Process
    22 nm
    14 nm-36%
    Architecture
    Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
    Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
    PassMark
    14,864+1%
    14,683
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Xeon E5-2680 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4215R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureXeon E5-2680 v3Xeon Silver 4215R
    Socket
    LGA2011
    LGA3647
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR4-2133
    Max RAM Capacity
    768 GB
    RAM Channels
    4
    ECC Support
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    40
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2680 v3) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4215R). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2680 v3 targets Server.

    FeatureXeon E5-2680 v3Xeon Silver 4215R
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    Yes
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    Target Use
    Server