Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Xeon E5-2683 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Xeon E5-2683 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Xeon E5-2683 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2680 v4

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (17,292 vs 17,459).

Xeon E5-2683 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2683 v4 better than Xeon E5-2680 v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2680 v4 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2683 v4 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2683 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2683 v4 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2683 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2683 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 14/28. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Xeon E5-2683 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2680 v4

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,292 points. Launch price was $1,745.

Xeon E5-2683 v4

The Xeon E5-2683 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,459 points. Launch price was $1,846.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon E5-2683 v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2683 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2680 v4 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2683 v4 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2680 v4 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2680 v4 uses the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2683 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2680 v4 scores 17,292 against the Xeon E5-2683 v4's 17,459 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-2683 v4. L3 cache: 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2683 v4.

Feature	Xeon E5-2680 v4	Xeon E5-2683 v4
Cores / Threads	14 / 28	16 / 32+14%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+10%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+14%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	35 MB	40 MB+14%
L2 Cache	3.5 MB	4 MB+14%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-EP (2016)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	17,292	17,459

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to 2400 memory speed. Both support up to 1536 GB of RAM. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 40 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C612 (Xeon E5-2680 v4) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2683 v4).

Feature	Xeon E5-2680 v4	Xeon E5-2683 v4
Socket	LGA2011	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	2400	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	1536 GB	1536 GB
RAM Channels	4	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	40	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2680 v4) / not specified (Xeon E5-2683 v4). Direct competitor: Xeon E5-2680 v4 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.