Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Xeon E5-4669 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Xeon E5-4669 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Xeon E5-4669 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2680 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 120W instead of 135W, a 15W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (17,292 vs 17,430).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (35 MB vs 45 MB).

Xeon E5-4669 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+28.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 35 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2680 v4 better than Xeon E5-4669 v3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2680 v4 is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4669 v3 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4669 v3 also has the bigger cache pool with 28.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 35 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4669 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 28.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 35 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2680 v4 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2680 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2680 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Xeon E5-4669 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2680 v4

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,292 points. Launch price was $1,745.

Xeon E5-4669 v3

The Xeon E5-4669 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,430 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon E5-4669 v3 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-4669 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2680 v4 versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4669 v3 — a 12.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2680 v4 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2680 v4 uses the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4669 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2680 v4 scores 17,292 against the Xeon E5-4669 v3's 17,430 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5-4669 v3. L3 cache: 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4669 v3.

Feature	Xeon E5-2680 v4	Xeon E5-4669 v3
Cores / Threads	14 / 28	18 / 36+29%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+14%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+14%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	35 MB	45 MB (total)+29%
L2 Cache	3.5 MB	256K (per core)+7214%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-EP (2016)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	17,292	17,430

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Xeon E5-2680 v4	Xeon E5-4669 v3
Socket	LGA2011	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	1536	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	40	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2680 v4) / not specified (Xeon E5-4669 v3). Direct competitor: Xeon E5-2680 v4 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.