
Xeon E5-2687W v4

Xeon E5-4669 v4
Xeon E5-2687W v4 vs Xeon E5-4669 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E5-2687W v4 vs Xeon E5-4669 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E5-2687W v4 vs Xeon E5-4669 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E5-2687W v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+28.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $4,866 less on MSRP ($2,141 MSRP vs $7,007 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 229.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 2.5 PassMark/$ ($2,141 MSRP vs $7,007 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 55 MB).
- ❌18.5% higher power demand at 160W vs 135W.
Xeon E5-4669 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Draws 135W instead of 160W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (825 vs 1,063).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,882 vs 8,255).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 8.2 PassMark/$ ($7,007 MSRP vs $2,141 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2687W v4 better than Xeon E5-4669 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5-2687W v4 vs Xeon E5-4669 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2687W v4
The Xeon E5-2687W v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,640 points. Launch price was $2,141.

Xeon E5-4669 v4
The Xeon E5-4669 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,547 points. Launch price was $7,007.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2687W v4 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E5-4669 v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-4669 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W v4 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4669 v4 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2687W v4 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). Both are built on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2687W v4 scores 17,640 against the Xeon E5-4669 v4's 17,547 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2687W v4. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,063 vs 825, a 25.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2687W v4 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,255 vs 2,882 (96.5% advantage for the Xeon E5-2687W v4). L3 cache: 30 MB on the Xeon E5-2687W v4 vs 55 MB on the Xeon E5-4669 v4.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2687W v4 | Xeon E5-4669 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 22 / 44+83% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+17% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+36% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB | 55 MB+83% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 5.5 MB+83% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 17,640 | 17,547 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,730 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,063+29% | 825 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,255+186% | 2,882 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. Both support up to 1536 GB of RAM. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 40 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C610,X99 (Xeon E5-2687W v4) and C610 (Xeon E5-4669 v4).
| Feature | Xeon E5-2687W v4 | Xeon E5-4669 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1536 GB | 1536 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | 40 |
Advanced Features
Both support Yes virtualization.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2687W v4 | Xeon E5-4669 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | Yes |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon E5-2687W v4 was priced at $2141, while the Xeon E5-4669 v4 came in at $7007. On launch pricing ($2141 vs $7007), Xeon E5-2687W v4 was $4866 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2687W v4 delivers 8.2 pts/$ vs 2.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4669 v4 — making the Xeon E5-2687W v4 the 106.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2687W v4 | Xeon E5-4669 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2141-69% | $7007 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2+228% | 2.5 |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















