Xeon E5-2695 v3 vs Xeon E7-4809 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2695 v3 vs Xeon E7-4809 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2695 v3 vs Xeon E7-4809 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2695 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E7-4809 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 105W instead of 120W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2695 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,471 vs 16,528).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 35 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2695 v3 better than Xeon E7-4809 v2?

Yes. Xeon E5-2695 v3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 24.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2695 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 24.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2695 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2695 v3 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2695 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 24.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2695 v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 28 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2695 v3 vs Xeon E7-4809 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2695 v3

The Xeon E5-2695 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 16,528 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E7-4809 v2

The Xeon E7-4809 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to none. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 16,471 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2695 v3 packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon E7-4809 v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v3 has 8 more cores. The Xeon E5-2695 v3 is built on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2695 v3 scores 16,528 against the Xeon E7-4809 v2's 16,471 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2695 v3. L3 cache: 35 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2695 v3 vs 12 MB on the Xeon E7-4809 v2.

Feature	Xeon E5-2695 v3	Xeon E7-4809 v2
Cores / Threads	14 / 28+133%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	none
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+21%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	35 MB (total)+192%	12 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	—
PassMark	16,528	16,471