Xeon E5-2695 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4214

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2695 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4214 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2695 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4214: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2695 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+112.1% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 17 MB).

Trade-offs

❌41.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 85W.

Xeon Silver 4214

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 85W instead of 120W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2695 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,472 vs 16,528).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 35 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2695 v3 better than Xeon Silver 4214?

Yes. Xeon E5-2695 v3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2695 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2695 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 112.1% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 17 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2695 v3 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2695 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4214 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2695 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4214 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2695 v3

The Xeon E5-2695 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 16,528 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Silver 4214

The Xeon Silver 4214 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 16,472 points. Launch price was $694.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2695 v3 packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4214 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v3 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4214 — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2695 v3 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2695 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4214 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2695 v3 scores 16,528 against the Xeon Silver 4214's 16,472 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2695 v3. L3 cache: 35 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2695 v3 vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon Silver 4214.

Feature	Xeon E5-2695 v3	Xeon Silver 4214
Cores / Threads	14 / 28+17%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+3%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+5%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	35 MB (total)+112%	16.5 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+2033%	12 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	16,528	16,472

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2695 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4214 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.