Xeon E5-2695 v3 vs Xeon Gold 6134

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2695 v3 vs Xeon Gold 6134 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2695 v3 vs Xeon Gold 6134: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2695 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+41.4% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Draws 120W instead of 130W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6134

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,519 vs 16,528).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 35 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,214 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2695 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6134 better than Xeon E5-2695 v3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6134 is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2695 v3 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2695 v3 also has the bigger cache pool with 41.4% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 25 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2695 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 41.4% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 25 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6134 is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 6134 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $2,214 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2695 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6134 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2695 v3 vs Xeon Gold 6134 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2695 v3

The Xeon E5-2695 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 16,528 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6134

The Xeon Gold 6134 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,519 points. Launch price was $2,214.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2695 v3 packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6134 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v3 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6134 — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6134 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2695 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2695 v3 scores 16,528 against the Xeon Gold 6134's 16,519 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2695 v3. L3 cache: 35 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2695 v3 vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6134.

Feature	Xeon E5-2695 v3	Xeon Gold 6134
Cores / Threads	14 / 28+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.7 GHz+12%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3.2 GHz+39%
L3 Cache	35 MB (total)+41%	24.75 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+3100%	8 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	16,528	16,519

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2695 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.