Xeon E5-2699 v3 vs Xeon E7-4830

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 vs Xeon E7-4830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 vs Xeon E7-4830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2699 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 24 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌38.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 105W.

Xeon E7-4830

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 105W instead of 145W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2699 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,981 vs 20,028).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 45 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2699 v3 better than Xeon E7-4830?

Yes. Xeon E5-2699 v3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 19.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2699 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 19.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2699 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2699 v3 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2699 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2699 v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011), 87.5% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 24 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 18 cores / 36 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 vs Xeon E7-4830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2699 v3

The Xeon E5-2699 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 20,028 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E7-4830

The Xeon E7-4830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EX (2011) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 19,981 points. Launch price was $2,059.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2699 v3 packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon E7-4830 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2699 v3 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699 v3 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4830 — a 40% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2699 v3 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Xeon E5-2699 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E7-4830 uses Westmere-EX (2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2699 v3 scores 20,028 against the Xeon E7-4830's 19,981 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2699 v3. L3 cache: 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2699 v3 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E7-4830.

Feature	Xeon E5-2699 v3	Xeon E7-4830
Cores / Threads	18 / 36+125%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+50%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+8%	2.13 GHz
L3 Cache	45 MB (total)+88%	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Westmere-EX (2011)
PassMark	20,028	19,981
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,696
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	10,382

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2699 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7-4830 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Xeon E5-2699 v3 versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon E7-4830 — the Xeon E5-2699 v3 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4830 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1536 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2699 v3) vs 0 (Xeon E7-4830) — the Xeon E5-2699 v3 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C612 (Xeon E5-2699 v3) and Boxboro (Xeon E7-4830).

Feature	Xeon E5-2699 v3	Xeon E7-4830
Socket	LGA2011	LGA1567
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	2400+80%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	1536 GB	2048 GB+33%
RAM Channels	4	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	40	0