Core i9-11900H vs Xeon E5-2699 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-11900H vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-11900H vs Xeon E5-2699 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-11900H

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 145W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,009 vs 20,028).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699 v3, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2699 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌314.3% higher power demand at 145W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-11900H better than Xeon E5-2699 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2699 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-11900H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2699 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-11900H still makes the most sense overall. Core i9-11900H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-11900H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-11900H vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-11900H

The Core i9-11900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,009 points. Launch price was $546.

Xeon E5-2699 v3

The Xeon E5-2699 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 20,028 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-11900H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2699 v3 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i9-11900H versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699 v3 — a 30.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-11900H (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i9-11900H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900H scores 20,009 against the Xeon E5-2699 v3's 20,028 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2699 v3. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900H vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2699 v3.

Feature	Core i9-11900H	Xeon E5-2699 v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+36%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.3 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	45 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H (2021)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	20,009	20,028

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-11900H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-11900H	Xeon E5-2699 v3
Socket	FCBGA1787	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	1536
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-11900H) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2699 v3). Direct competitor: Xeon E5-2699 v3 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.