Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen Embedded V3C48 Performance Spectrum

Core i9-11900H

8 / 16

20,009

0.0%

20,203

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen Embedded V3C48 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen Embedded V3C48: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-11900H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,009 vs 20,203).
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

2022

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded V3C48 better than Core i9-11900H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i9-11900H is ahead with a 16.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded V3C48 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. Core i9-11900H also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen Embedded V3C48 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1787, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen Embedded V3C48 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-11900H

The Core i9-11900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,009 points. Launch price was $546.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,203 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i9-11900H and Ryzen Embedded V3C48 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i9-11900H versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 — a 25.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-11900H (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-11900H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses Rembrandt (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900H scores 20,009 against the Ryzen Embedded V3C48's 20,203 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V3C48. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48.

Feature	Core i9-11900H	Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+29%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.3 GHz+57%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+50%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin	6 nm-40%
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H (2021)	Rembrandt (2022)
PassMark	20,009	20,203

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-11900H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses FP7 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.