Core i9-11900H vs Xeon E7-4830

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-11900H vs Xeon E7-4830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-11900H vs Xeon E7-4830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-11900H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E7-4830

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,981 vs 20,009).
❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-11900H better than Xeon E7-4830?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-4830 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-11900H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-11900H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-11900H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-11900H still makes the most sense overall. Core i9-11900H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-11900H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-11900H vs Xeon E7-4830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-11900H

The Core i9-11900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,009 points. Launch price was $546.

Xeon E7-4830

The Xeon E7-4830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EX (2011) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 19,981 points. Launch price was $2,059.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i9-11900H and Xeon E7-4830 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i9-11900H versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4830 — a 68.5% clock advantage for the Core i9-11900H (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Core i9-11900H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E7-4830 uses Westmere-EX (2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900H scores 20,009 against the Xeon E7-4830's 19,981 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i9-11900H. Both processors carry 24 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i9-11900H	Xeon E7-4830
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+104%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.13 GHz+1%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin-69%	32 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H (2021)	Westmere-EX (2011)
PassMark	20,009	19,981
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,696
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	10,382

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-11900H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-4830 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-11900H	Xeon E7-4830
Socket	FCBGA1787	LGA1567
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	—	2048 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	0