Core i9-11900H vs Xeon W-1290

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-11900H vs Xeon W-1290 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-11900H vs Xeon W-1290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-11900H

2021

Why buy it

✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1290 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,009 vs 20,112).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon W-1290

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $498 MSRP, while Core i9-11900H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-1290 better than Core i9-11900H?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-1290 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-11900H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-1290 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1290 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-1290 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-1290 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $498 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (40.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-11900H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020) and 20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-11900H vs Xeon W-1290 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-11900H

The Core i9-11900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,009 points. Launch price was $546.

Xeon W-1290

The Xeon W-1290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,112 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-11900H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-1290 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-1290 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i9-11900H versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1290 — a 4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1290 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-11900H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon W-1290 uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900H scores 20,009 against the Xeon W-1290's 20,112 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-1290. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900H vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290.

Feature	Core i9-11900H	Xeon W-1290
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	5.1 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+52%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+20%	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H (2021)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	20,009	20,112

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-11900H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1290 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.