Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 5 5600F

Intel

Core i9-11900H

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2021
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 5600F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2025

Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 5 5600F Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 5 5600F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 5 5600F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-11900H

2021

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +24.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (20,009 vs 20,225).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).

Ryzen 5 5600F

2025

Why buy it

  • βœ…+1.1% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Core i9-11900H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 5600F better than Core i9-11900H?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i9-11900H is ahead with a 24.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 5600F pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 5600F also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 5600F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 5600F is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 5600F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $99 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i9-11900H is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 24.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (204.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 5600F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 5 5600F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i9-11900H

The Core i9-11900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,009 points. Launch price was $546.

AMD

Ryzen 5 5600F

The Ryzen 5 5600F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020βˆ’2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,225 points. Launch price was $299.

⚑

Processing Power

The Core i9-11900H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600F offers 6 cores / 12 threads β€” the Core i9-11900H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i9-11900H versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600F β€” a 20.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-11900H (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i9-11900H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 5 5600F uses Vermeer (2020βˆ’2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900H scores 20,009 against the Ryzen 5 5600F's 20,225 β€” a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600F. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900H vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600F.

FeatureCore i9-11900HRyzen 5 5600F
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+23%
4 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3 GHz+43%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)
32 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512 kB (per core)
Process
10 nm SuperFin
7 nm-30%
Architecture
Tiger Lake-H (2021)
Vermeer (2020βˆ’2025)
PassMark
20,009
20,225+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-11900H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600F uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i9-11900HRyzen 5 5600F
Socket
FCBGA1787
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
β€”
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
β€”
128 GB
RAM Channels
β€”
2
ECC Support
β€”
Yes
PCIe Lanes
β€”
24
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-11900H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600F). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600F targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i9-11900HRyzen 5 5600F
Integrated GPU
β€”
No
Unlocked
β€”
Yes
AVX-512
β€”
No
Virtualization
β€”
AMD-V
Target Use
β€”
Desktop