Xeon E5-4610 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4116

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-4610 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4116 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-4610 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4116: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-4610 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅+51.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 17 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4116 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌23.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 85W.

Xeon Silver 4116

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 85W instead of 105W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,918 vs 15,084).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 25 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4116 better than Xeon E5-4610 v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Silver 4116 is ahead with a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4610 v4 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4610 v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 51.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 17 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4610 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 51.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 17 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4116 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Silver 4116 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4116 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-4610 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4116 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-4610 v4

The Xeon E5-4610 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,084 points. Launch price was $1,219.

Xeon Silver 4116

The Xeon Silver 4116 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,918 points. Launch price was $1,002.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-4610 v4 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4116 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Silver 4116 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4610 v4 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4116 — a 50% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4116 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-4610 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4610 v4 scores 15,084 against the Xeon Silver 4116's 14,918 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E5-4610 v4. L3 cache: 25 MB on the Xeon E5-4610 v4 vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4116.

Feature	Xeon E5-4610 v4	Xeon Silver 4116
Cores / Threads	10 / 20	12 / 24+20%
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	3 GHz+67%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.1 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	25 MB+52%	16.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2.5 MB+150%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	15,084+1%	14,918

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-4610 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.