Xeon E5-4667 v3 vs Xeon W-10885M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-4667 v3 vs Xeon W-10885M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-4667 v3 vs Xeon W-10885M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-4667 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-10885M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,397 vs 15,486).
❌Launch MSRP is still $128 MSRP, while Xeon W-10885M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌6650% higher power demand at 135W vs 2W.

Xeon W-10885M

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 135W, a 133W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-10885M better than Xeon E5-4667 v3?

Yes. Xeon W-10885M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-10885M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-10885M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-10885M is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4667 v3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon W-10885M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $128 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-4667 v3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (120.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-10885M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-4667 v3 vs Xeon W-10885M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-4667 v3

The Xeon E5-4667 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,397 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-10885M

The Xeon W-10885M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,486 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-4667 v3 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-10885M offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v3 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-10885M — a 55% clock advantage for the Xeon W-10885M (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W-10885M uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4667 v3 scores 15,397 against the Xeon W-10885M's 15,486 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon W-10885M. L3 cache: 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4667 v3 vs 16 MB on the Xeon W-10885M.

Feature	Xeon E5-4667 v3	Xeon W-10885M
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	5.1 GHz+76%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.4 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	40 MB (total)+150%	16 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Comet Lake-H (2020)
PassMark	15,397	15,486

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-10885M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.