Xeon E5-4669 v4 vs Xeon W-11855M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-4669 v4 vs Xeon W-11855M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-4669 v4 vs Xeon W-11855M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-4669 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+205.6% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 18 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 38.8 PassMark/$ ($7,007 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.

Xeon W-11855M

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,557 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $7,007 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1449.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.8 vs 2.5 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $7,007 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (17,462 vs 17,547).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 55 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-11855M better than Xeon E5-4669 v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-11855M is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4669 v4 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4669 v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 205.6% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4669 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 22 cores and 44 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 205.6% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-11855M is the better buy right now. Xeon W-11855M comes in $6,557 cheaper on MSRP at $450 MSRP versus $7,007 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4669 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 1449.6% better value on MSRP (38.8 vs 2.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-11855M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-4669 v4 vs Xeon W-11855M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-4669 v4

The Xeon E5-4669 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,547 points. Launch price was $7,007.

Xeon W-11855M

The Xeon W-11855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,462 points. Launch price was $450.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-4669 v4 packs 22 cores / 44 threads, while the Xeon W-11855M offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-4669 v4 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4669 v4 versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-11855M — a 48.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11855M (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-4669 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-11855M uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4669 v4 scores 17,547 against the Xeon W-11855M's 17,462 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-4669 v4. L3 cache: 55 MB on the Xeon E5-4669 v4 vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11855M.

Feature	Xeon E5-4669 v4	Xeon W-11855M
Cores / Threads	22 / 44+267%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.9 GHz+63%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.2 GHz+45%
L3 Cache	55 MB+206%	18 MB (total)
L2 Cache	5.5 MB+340%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm SuperFin-29%
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Tiger Lake-H (2021)
PassMark	17,547	17,462
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,730	—
Geekbench 6 Single	825	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,882	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-4669 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-11855M uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-4669 v4	Xeon W-11855M
Socket	LGA2011	FCBGA1787
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	1536 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	40	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Xeon E5-4669 v4) / not specified (Xeon W-11855M).

Feature	Xeon E5-4669 v4	Xeon W-11855M
Integrated GPU	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-4669 v4 was priced at $7007, while the Xeon W-11855M came in at $450. On launch pricing ($7007 vs $450), Xeon W-11855M was $6557 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-4669 v4 delivers 2.5 pts/$ vs 38.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11855M — making the Xeon W-11855M the 175.8% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-4669 v4	Xeon W-11855M
MSRP	$7007	$450-94%
Performance per Dollar	2.5	38.8+1452%
Release Date	2016	2021

Search Xeon E5-4669 v4 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-11855M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.