Xeon E5-4669 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6126

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-4669 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6126 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-4669 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6126: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-4669 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+185.7% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 19 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $7,007 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6126 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6126

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 125W instead of 135W, a 10W reduction.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 40) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4669 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,492 vs 17,547).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 55 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4669 v4 better than Xeon Gold 6126?

Yes. Xeon E5-4669 v4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-4669 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4669 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 22 cores and 44 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 185.7% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 19 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4669 v4 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-4669 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $7,007 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (2.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6126 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-4669 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6126 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-4669 v4

The Xeon E5-4669 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,547 points. Launch price was $7,007.

Xeon Gold 6126

The Xeon Gold 6126 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 17,492 points. Launch price was $1,776.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-4669 v4 packs 22 cores / 44 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6126 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-4669 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4669 v4 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6126 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6126 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon E5-4669 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6126 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4669 v4 scores 17,547 against the Xeon Gold 6126's 17,492 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-4669 v4. L3 cache: 55 MB on the Xeon E5-4669 v4 vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6126.

Feature	Xeon E5-4669 v4	Xeon Gold 6126
Cores / Threads	22 / 44+83%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.7 GHz+23%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.6 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	55 MB+186%	19.25 MB
L2 Cache	5.5 MB	12 MB+118%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	17,547	17,492
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,730	—
Geekbench 6 Single	825	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,882	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-4669 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6126 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Xeon E5-4669 v4 versus 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6126 — the Xeon Gold 6126 supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-4669 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 768 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-4669 v4) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6126). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-4669 v4) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6126) — the Xeon Gold 6126 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C610 (Xeon E5-4669 v4) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6126).

Feature	Xeon E5-4669 v4	Xeon Gold 6126
Socket	LGA2011	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	2666+11%
Max RAM Capacity	1536 GB+100%	768 GB
RAM Channels	4	6+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	40	48+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon Gold 6126 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Xeon E5-4669 v4) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6126). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6126 rivals EPYC 7301.