
Xeon E7-8857 v2

Xeon Platinum 8280
Xeon E7-8857 v2 vs Xeon Platinum 8280 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E7-8857 v2 vs Xeon Platinum 8280 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E7-8857 v2 vs Xeon Platinum 8280: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E7-8857 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,171 less on MSRP ($3,838 MSRP vs $10,009 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 157.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 3.7 PassMark/$ ($3,838 MSRP vs $10,009 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 205W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8280 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (36,304 vs 36,830).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 39 MB).
Xeon Platinum 8280
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+28.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 40) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.7 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($10,009 MSRP vs $3,838 MSRP).
- ❌57.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Platinum 8280 better than Xeon E7-8857 v2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E7-8857 v2 vs Xeon Platinum 8280 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E7-8857 v2
The Xeon E7-8857 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 36,304 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Platinum 8280
The Xeon Platinum 8280 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 36,830 points. Launch price was $10,009.
Processing Power
The Xeon E7-8857 v2 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8280 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8280 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E7-8857 v2 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8280 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8280 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8280 is built on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E7-8857 v2 scores 36,304 against the Xeon Platinum 8280's 36,830 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8280. L3 cache: 30 MB on the Xeon E7-8857 v2 vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8280.
| Feature | Xeon E7-8857 v2 | Xeon Platinum 8280 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 12 | 28 / 56+133% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+11% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB | 38.5 MB (total)+28% |
| L2 Cache | — | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | — | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) |
| PassMark | 36,304 | 36,830+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E7-8857 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8280 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Xeon E7-8857 v2 versus 2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8280 — the Xeon Platinum 8280 supports 83.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 1536 of RAM. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E7-8857 v2) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8280). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E7-8857 v2) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8280) — the Xeon Platinum 8280 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C602J (Xeon E7-8857 v2) and LGA3647 (Xeon Platinum 8280).
| Feature | Xeon E7-8857 v2 | Xeon Platinum 8280 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600 | 2933+83% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1536 | 1536 |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 6+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | 48+20% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8280 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon E7-8857 v2 rivals Xeon E7-4850 v2; Xeon Platinum 8280 rivals EPYC 7702.
| Feature | Xeon E7-8857 v2 | Xeon Platinum 8280 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon E7-8857 v2 was priced at $3838, while the Xeon Platinum 8280 came in at $10009. On launch pricing ($3838 vs $10009), Xeon E7-8857 v2 was $6171 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E7-8857 v2 delivers 9.5 pts/$ vs 3.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8280 — making the Xeon E7-8857 v2 the 88% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E7-8857 v2 | Xeon Platinum 8280 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3838-62% | $10009 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.5+157% | 3.7 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















