Xeon E7-8857 v2 vs Xeon W-3265M

Intel

Xeon E7-8857 v2

12 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Xeon W-3265M

24 Cores48 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019

Xeon E7-8857 v2 vs Xeon W-3265M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E7-8857 v2 vs Xeon W-3265M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E7-8857 v2 vs Xeon W-3265M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E7-8857 v2

2014

Why buy it

  • βœ…+2.2% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…Costs $2,462 less on MSRP ($3,838 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 67.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($3,838 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 130W instead of 205W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3265M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-3265M

2019

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +28.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…60% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 40) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • βœ…AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (35,506 vs 36,304).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $3,838 MSRP).
  • ❌57.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 130W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E7-8857 v2 better than Xeon W-3265M?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-3265M is ahead with a 28.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-8857 v2 pulls ahead with 2.2% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-8857 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.2% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E7-8857 v2 is the better buy right now. Xeon E7-8857 v2 comes in $2,462 cheaper on MSRP at $3,838 MSRP versus $6,300 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W-3265M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 28.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 67.8% better value on MSRP (9.5 vs 5.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon W-3265M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E7-8857 v2 vs Xeon W-3265M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon E7-8857 v2

The Xeon E7-8857 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 36,304 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon W-3265M

The Xeon W-3265M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019βˆ’2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,506 points. Launch price was $6,353.

⚑

Processing Power

The Xeon E7-8857 v2 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-3265M offers 24 cores / 48 threads β€” the Xeon W-3265M has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E7-8857 v2 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265M β€” a 24.4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3265M (base: 3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon W-3265M is built on the Cascade Lake (2019βˆ’2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E7-8857 v2 scores 36,304 against the Xeon W-3265M's 35,506 β€” a 2.2% lead for the Xeon E7-8857 v2. L3 cache: 30 MB on the Xeon E7-8857 v2 vs 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265M.

FeatureXeon E7-8857 v2Xeon W-3265M
Cores / Threads
12 / 12
24 / 48+100%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
4.6 GHz+28%
Base Clock
3 GHz+11%
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
30 MB
33 MB+10%
L2 Cache
β€”
24 MB
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
β€”
Cascade Lake (2019βˆ’2020)
PassMark
36,304+2%
35,506
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E7-8857 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3265M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Xeon E7-8857 v2 versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3265M β€” the Xeon W-3265M supports 83.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-8857 v2 supports up to 1536 of RAM compared to 1024 β€” 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E7-8857 v2) vs 6 (Xeon W-3265M). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E7-8857 v2) vs 64 (Xeon W-3265M) β€” the Xeon W-3265M offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C602J (Xeon E7-8857 v2) and C620 (Xeon W-3265M).

FeatureXeon E7-8857 v2Xeon W-3265M
Socket
LGA2011
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
1600
2933+83%
Max RAM Capacity
1536+50%
1024
RAM Channels
4
6+50%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
40
64+60%
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3265M supports AVX-512 instructions β€” important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon E7-8857 v2 rivals Xeon E7-4850 v2; Xeon W-3265M rivals EPYC 7402.

FeatureXeon E7-8857 v2Xeon W-3265M
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E7-8857 v2 was priced at $3838, while the Xeon W-3265M came in at $6300. On launch pricing ($3838 vs $6300), Xeon E7-8857 v2 was $2462 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E7-8857 v2 delivers 9.5 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3265M β€” making the Xeon E7-8857 v2 the 50.7% better value option.

FeatureXeon E7-8857 v2Xeon W-3265M
MSRP
$3838-39%
$6300
Performance per Dollar
9.5+70%
5.6
Release Date
2014
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.