
Xeon Gold 5117

Xeon W-3223
Xeon Gold 5117 vs Xeon W-3223 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Gold 5117 vs Xeon W-3223 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Gold 5117 vs Xeon W-3223: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Gold 5117
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 160W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3223 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,897 vs 16,956).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 57.7 PassMark/$ ($1,286 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
Xeon W-3223
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $992 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $1,286 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 338.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.7 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $1,286 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌52.4% higher power demand at 160W vs 105W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-3223 better than Xeon Gold 5117?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 5117 vs Xeon W-3223 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 5117
The Xeon Gold 5117 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. L2 cache: 14 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 16,897 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-3223
The Xeon W-3223 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,956 points. Launch price was $749.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5117 packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon W-3223 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 5117 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5117 versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon W-3223 — a 40% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3223 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5117 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-3223 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5117 scores 16,897 against the Xeon W-3223's 16,956 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon W-3223. L3 cache: 19.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 5117 vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-3223.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5117 | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 28+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz+50% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+75% |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB+17% | 16.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 14 MB+75% | 8 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 16,897 | 16,956 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5117 | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 | — |
| RAM Channels | 6 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5117) / not specified (Xeon W-3223). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5117 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5117 | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon Gold 5117 was priced at $1286, while the Xeon W-3223 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($1286 vs $294), Xeon W-3223 was $992 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 5117 delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 57.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3223 — making the Xeon W-3223 the 125.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5117 | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1286 | $294-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.1 | 57.7+340% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














