
Xeon E-2378

Xeon Gold 5117
Xeon E-2378 vs Xeon Gold 5117 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E-2378 vs Xeon Gold 5117 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E-2378 vs Xeon Gold 5117: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E-2378
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $924 less on MSRP ($362 MSRP vs $1,286 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 258.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 47.2 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($362 MSRP vs $1,286 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 19 MB).
Xeon Gold 5117
2017Why buy it
- ✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2378 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,897 vs 17,069).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 47.2 PassMark/$ ($1,286 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2378 better than Xeon Gold 5117?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E-2378 vs Xeon Gold 5117 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2378
The Xeon E-2378 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 17,069 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 5117
The Xeon Gold 5117 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. L2 cache: 14 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 16,897 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon E-2378 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5117 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon Gold 5117 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2378 versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5117 — a 52.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2378 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon E-2378 uses the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5117 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2378 scores 17,069 against the Xeon Gold 5117's 16,897 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E-2378. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2378 vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 5117.
| Feature | Xeon E-2378 | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 14 / 28+75% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+71% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+30% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 19.25 MB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+3557% | 14 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake-E (2021) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 17,069+1% | 16,897 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,821 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,986 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E-2378 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5117 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Xeon E-2378 versus 2400 on the Xeon Gold 5117 — the Xeon E-2378 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5117 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Xeon E-2378) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 5117). PCIe lanes: 20 (Xeon E-2378) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 5117) — the Xeon Gold 5117 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C252,C256 (Xeon E-2378) and C621 (Xeon Gold 5117).
| Feature | Xeon E-2378 | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+33% | 2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 768 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: Yes (Xeon E-2378) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5117). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5117 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.
| Feature | Xeon E-2378 | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon E-2378 was priced at $362, while the Xeon Gold 5117 came in at $1286. On launch pricing ($362 vs $1286), Xeon E-2378 was $924 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E-2378 delivers 47.2 pts/$ vs 13.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5117 — making the Xeon E-2378 the 112.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E-2378 | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $362-72% | $1286 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.2+260% | 13.1 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














