Xeon E-2378 vs Xeon W-3223

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2378 vs Xeon W-3223 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2378 vs Xeon W-3223: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2378

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 160W, a 95W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.2 vs 57.7 PassMark/$ ($362 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).

Xeon W-3223

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $68 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.7 vs 47.2 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2378 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,956 vs 17,069).
❌146.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2378 better than Xeon W-3223?

Yes. Xeon E-2378 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2378 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2378 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2378 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-3223 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E-2378 comes in 23.1% more expensive on MSRP at $362 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-3223 is also 22.3% better value on MSRP (57.7 vs 47.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2378 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019), more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E-2378 vs Xeon W-3223 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2378

The Xeon E-2378 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 17,069 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-3223

The Xeon W-3223 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,956 points. Launch price was $749.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E-2378 and Xeon W-3223 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2378 versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon W-3223 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2378 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon E-2378 uses the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-3223 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2378 scores 17,069 against the Xeon W-3223's 16,956 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E-2378. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2378 vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-3223.

Feature	Xeon E-2378	Xeon W-3223
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+14%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.5 GHz+35%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	16.5 MB+3%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+6300%	8 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Rocket Lake-E (2021)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	17,069	16,956
Geekbench 6 Single	1,821	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,986	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2378 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3223 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E-2378	Xeon W-3223
Socket	LGA1200	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Xeon E-2378) / not specified (Xeon W-3223).

Feature	Xeon E-2378	Xeon W-3223
Integrated GPU	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	Yes	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E-2378 was priced at $362, while the Xeon W-3223 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($362 vs $294), Xeon W-3223 was $68 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E-2378 delivers 47.2 pts/$ vs 57.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3223 — making the Xeon W-3223 the 20.1% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E-2378	Xeon W-3223
MSRP	$362	$294-19%
Performance per Dollar	47.2	57.7+22%
Release Date	2021	2019

Search Xeon E-2378 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3223 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.