Xeon Gold 5218 vs Xeon Gold 6130

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 5218 vs Xeon Gold 6130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 5218 vs Xeon Gold 6130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 5218

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,273 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6130 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Gold 6130

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (21,500 vs 21,586).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5218 better than Xeon Gold 6130?

Yes. Xeon Gold 5218 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 5218 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5218 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5218 is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 5218 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,273 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (17.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 5218 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Gold 5218 vs Xeon Gold 6130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 5218

The Xeon Gold 5218 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,586 points. Launch price was $1,273.

Xeon Gold 6130

The Xeon Gold 6130 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,500 points. Launch price was $1,894.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon Gold 5218 and Xeon Gold 6130 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130 — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5218 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5218 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6130 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5218 scores 21,586 against the Xeon Gold 6130's 21,500 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 5218. Both processors carry 22 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5218	Xeon Gold 6130
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+5%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+10%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	22 MB	22 MB
L2 Cache	16 MB	16 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	21,586	21,500
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	18,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,029
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	7,545

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to 2666 memory speed. Both support up to 768 GB of RAM. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Gold 5218) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6130).

Feature	Xeon Gold 5218	Xeon Gold 6130
Socket	LGA3647	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2666	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	768 GB	768 GB
RAM Channels	6	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	48	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5218) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6130). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6130 targets Server / Enterprise computing. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6130 rivals EPYC 7301.