
Xeon Gold 5218

Xeon W-11955M
Xeon Gold 5218 vs Xeon W-11955M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Gold 5218 vs Xeon W-11955M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Gold 5218 vs Xeon W-11955M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Gold 5218
2019Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-11955M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,586 vs 21,702).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.0 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($1,273 MSRP vs $623 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Xeon W-11955M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $650 less on MSRP ($623 MSRP vs $1,273 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 105.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.8 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($623 MSRP vs $1,273 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-11955M better than Xeon Gold 5218?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 5218 vs Xeon W-11955M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 5218
The Xeon Gold 5218 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,586 points. Launch price was $1,273.

Xeon W-11955M
The Xeon W-11955M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,702 points. Launch price was $623.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5218 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-11955M offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 5218 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218 versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-11955M — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11955M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5218 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-11955M uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5218 scores 21,586 against the Xeon W-11955M's 21,702 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-11955M. L3 cache: 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 5218 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11955M.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 5 GHz+28% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz+10% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 22 MB | 24 MB (total)+9% |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+1180% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm SuperFin-29% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| PassMark | 21,586 | 21,702 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 5218 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-11955M uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | FCBGA1787 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 | — |
| RAM Channels | 6 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5218) / not specified (Xeon W-11955M).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon Gold 5218 was priced at $1273, while the Xeon W-11955M came in at $623. On launch pricing ($1273 vs $623), Xeon W-11955M was $650 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 5218 delivers 17.0 pts/$ vs 34.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11955M — making the Xeon W-11955M the 69% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1273 | $623-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.0 | 34.8+105% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















