Xeon Gold 5317 vs Xeon Gold 6252

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 5317 vs Xeon Gold 6252 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 5317 vs Xeon Gold 6252: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 5317

2021

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 36 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,088 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6252 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Gold 6252

2019

Why buy it

✅+98.6% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 18 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (27,148 vs 27,448).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5317 better than Xeon Gold 6252?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6252 is ahead with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5317 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark. Xeon Gold 6252 also has the bigger cache pool with 98.6% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5317 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5317 is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 5317 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,088 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6252 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (25.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 5317 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 24/48. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Gold 5317 vs Xeon Gold 6252 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 5317

The Xeon Gold 5317 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,448 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6252

The Xeon Gold 6252 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,148 points. Launch price was $3,655.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 5317 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6252 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6252 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5317 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6252 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6252 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5317 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6252 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5317 scores 27,448 against the Xeon Gold 6252's 27,148 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 5317. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5317 vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6252.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5317	Xeon Gold 6252
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	24 / 48+100%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.7 GHz+3%
Base Clock	3 GHz+43%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	35.75 MB+99%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	24 MB+2300%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake-SP (2021)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	27,448+1%	27,148

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 5317 uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6252 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.