
Xeon Gold 5318Y

Xeon Silver 4316
Xeon Gold 5318Y vs Xeon Silver 4316 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Gold 5318Y vs Xeon Silver 4316 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Gold 5318Y vs Xeon Silver 4316: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Gold 5318Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 30 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Silver 4316
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 165W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5318Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,846 vs 28,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,126 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5318Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 5318Y better than Xeon Silver 4316?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 5318Y vs Xeon Silver 4316 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 5318Y
The Xeon Gold 5318Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,139 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Silver 4316
The Xeon Silver 4316 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 32,556 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5318Y packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4316 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 5318Y has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5318Y versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4316 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). Both are built on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture using a 10 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5318Y scores 33,139 against the Xeon Silver 4316's 32,556 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon Gold 5318Y. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 28,500 vs 21,846 (26.4% advantage for the Xeon Gold 5318Y). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,251 vs 1,621, a 25.8% lead for the Xeon Silver 4316 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 21,846 vs 13,010 (50.7% advantage for the Xeon Gold 5318Y). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5318Y vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4316.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5318Y | Xeon Silver 4316 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+20% | 20 / 40 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.3 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total)+20% | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 33,139+2% | 32,556 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 28,500+30% | 21,846 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,251 | 1,621+30% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 21,846+68% | 13,010 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA4189 socket with PCIe 4.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 5318Y versus DDR4-2667 on the Xeon Silver 4316 — the Xeon Gold 5318Y supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6144 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 64 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621A,Ice Lake-SP (Xeon Gold 5318Y) and C620 (Xeon Silver 4316).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5318Y | Xeon Silver 4316 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933+10% | DDR4-2667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB | 6144 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 5318Y targets Server / Virtualization, Xeon Silver 4316 targets Budget Server / Virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5318Y rivals Xeon Silver 4316; Xeon Silver 4316 rivals EPYC 7313.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5318Y | Xeon Silver 4316 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Server / Virtualization | Budget Server / Virtualization |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














