
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

Xeon Gold 5318Y
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon Gold 5318Y Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon Gold 5318Y FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon Gold 5318Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 165W, a 137W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Xeon Gold 5318Y needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon Gold 5318Y.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5318Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (22,246 vs 28,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5318Y, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 5318Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌489.3% higher power demand at 165W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 5318Y better than Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Xeon Gold 5318Y Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,619 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Gold 5318Y
The Xeon Gold 5318Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,139 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5318Y offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 5318Y has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5318Y — a 40% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5318Y uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 33,619 against the Xeon Gold 5318Y's 33,139 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 22,246 vs 28,500 (24.6% advantage for the Xeon Gold 5318Y). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,864 vs 1,251, a 78.4% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,012 vs 21,846 (37.1% advantage for the Xeon Gold 5318Y). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5318Y.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 | Xeon Gold 5318Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 24 / 48+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+50% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.1 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 36 MB (total)+125% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Strix Point (2024−2025) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 33,619+1% | 33,139 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 22,246 | 28,500+28% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,864+129% | 1,251 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,012 | 21,846+46% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5318Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 5318Y — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports 172.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5318Y supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 5318Y). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 5318Y) — the Xeon Gold 5318Y offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8,FP7 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) and C621A,Ice Lake-SP (Xeon Gold 5318Y).
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 | Xeon Gold 5318Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-8000+173% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 6144 GB+2300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 64+300% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 5318Y). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the Xeon Gold 5318Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 targets Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming, Xeon Gold 5318Y targets Server / Virtualization. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 rivals Core i9-14900HX; Xeon Gold 5318Y rivals Xeon Silver 4316.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 | Xeon Gold 5318Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 890M | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, IOMMU | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming | Server / Virtualization |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













